NHER 65555 (Monument record) - ?Roman, Late Saxon and post-medieval features

The Norfolk Heritage Explorer is a filtered version of the Norfolk HER intended for casual research. Please to consult the full record.

See also further .

Summary

A geophysical survey of this site in 2016 identified no responses of obviously archaeological significance, although it was suggested that a number of the more distinct discrete anomalies might represent infilled pit-type features. Subsequent trial trenching identified a number of linear and discrete features, the majority of which produced little in the way of dating evidence. It is though likely that at least one of the ditches recorded was contemporary with the Roman field system identified during earlier excavations at the site to the north-east (NHER 39833), although no finds of this date were recovered. The majority of the discrete features were very similar, shallow pits with notably charcoal-rich fills and scorched margins that had probably been associated with small-scale charcoal production. A Late Saxon radiocarbon date was obtained for one of these features, suggesting they were of a broadly similar date to a group of very similar features recorded at the adjacent site (two of which had produced Middle to Late Saxon radiocarbon dates). There were little evidence for subsequent activity on the site, with later features limited to a number of post-medieval ditches.

Protected Status/Designation

  • None recorded

Location

Map sheet TG22SW
Civil Parish BUXTON WITH LAMMAS, BROADLAND, NORFOLK
Civil Parish FRETTENHAM, BROADLAND, NORFOLK

Map

March 2016. Geophysical Survey.
Magnetometer survey of proposed quarry extension.
Although numerous discrete anomalies were identified these were mostly background variations of probable natural origin. A small number of slightly stronger and/or more clearly defined anomalies do however potentially infilled pit-type features. There was however no obvious pattern to these anomalies suggesting they are unlikely to represent a significant archaeological site.
The small number of linear responses included narrow negative anomalies that corresponded with visible displacements of the subsoil between adjacent plough furrows. Weak positive linear anomalies close to these may represent localised increases in soil depth.
The remaining discrete anomalies were probably caused by ferrous objects in the plough soil, most likely modern debris.
See report (S1) for further details.
P. Watkins (HES), 25 April 2022.

February-March 2019. Trial Trenching.
Evaluation of site of proposed quarry extension.
The 34 trenches excavated revealed a number of linear and discrete features, although the majority produced little in the way of dating evidence.
A number of ditches were exposed in the northern half of the site, the alignments of which indicate they were most likely associated with at least two distinct phases of activity. A north-west to south-east aligned feature at the northern end of the site was probably contemporary with the similarly-aligned Roman field system recorded during earlier excavations at the site to the north-east (NHER 39833). It is suggested that a number of the other ditches were probably also Roman, although no finds of this date were recovered. One of these east-north-east to west-south-west aligned ditches also clearly corresponds with a former field boundary depicted on the Buxton tithe map. A similarly-aligned feature to the south also produced a number of post-medieval finds, suggesting another, parallel ditch between the two and a nearby perpendicular feature were most likely also of a relatively recent date. Post-medieval finds were also recovered from a north-east to south-west aligned ditch.
The discrete features included a group of 17 shallow pits of consistent shape and size that all had a notably charcoal-rich main fill. In many cases the underlying material was heat-reddened, indicating that either burning had occurred in-situ or the charcoal-rich material had been deposited when still hot. Samples taken from these deposits contained exceptionally rich assemblages of what appears to be predominantly oak charcoal but little else in the way of plant macrofossils. Similar features recorded at the site to the north-east were thought to have been associated with charcoal production and this was almost certainly the case with the pits here. Although no finds were recovered, a Late Saxon radiocarbon date of 908-1028 cal AD at 95.4% probability (SUERC-87181; 1041 +/- 24 BP) was obtained for charcoal from one of the pits. This is consistent with two Middle to Late Saxon dates (690-900 cal AD and 690-890 cal AD) that were obtained for similar features at the adjacent site and serves to confirm that this activity continued into the latter part of this period.
Also revealed were a series of discrete circular features that were all very similar to features recorded during earlier work to the north-east, which had been identified as glacial hollows. The five examples tested at this site appeared to be of similar origin, with all of them found to be in excess of 1.2m deep and infilled with homogenous, sterile, silty deposits.
See report (S2) for further details.
P. Watkins (HES), 26 April 2022.

May 2019. Desk-based Assessment.
Assessment of proposed extension to Mayton Wood Quarry comprising this field and land to the north-east (NHER 39833), east and south-east (NHER 65556).
See report (S3) for further details.
P. Watkins (HES), 26 April 2022.

  • --- Secondary File: Secondary File.
  • <S1> Unpublished Contractor Report: Bartlett, A. D. H. 2016. Land at Mayton Wood Quarry, Buxton with Lammas, Norfolk. Report on Archaeological Geophysical Survey 2016. Bartlett-Clark Consultancy.
  • <S2> Unpublished Contractor Report: Middleton, E. 2019. Mayton Wood Quarry Extension, Buxton with Lammas, Norfolk. An Archaeological Evaluation. Cambridge Archaeological Unit. 1432.
  • <S3> Unpublished Contractor Report: Wiseman, R. 2019. Mayton Wood Quarry, Buxton with Lammas, Norfolk. Desk-based Assessment. Cambridge Archaeological Unit. 1422.
  • ANIMAL REMAINS (Unknown date)
  • BURNT FLINT (Unknown date)
  • POT (Unknown date)
  • TILE (Unknown date)
  • XFIRED CLAY (Unknown date)
  • BRICK (Post Medieval - 1540 AD to 1900 AD)
  • POT (Post Medieval - 1540 AD to 1900 AD)

Related NHER Records (0)

Record last edited

Apr 26 2022 7:18AM

Comments and Feedback

Your feedback is welcome; if you can provide any new information about this record, please contact the Norfolk Historic Environment Record.